OBJECT-BASED BUILDINGS DETECTION & CHANGE ANALYSIS USING MULTI TEMPORAL HIGH RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING DATA
With
urbanization and urban sprawl, land-use and land-cover change studies became an
area of keen interest for researchers. Cause of rapid urbanization is peoples’
responses to economic opportunities, and government policies. New housing
societies and business model adopted overall globe has provided opportunities
for new land uses.
Image by piviso from Pixabay |
“Image Classification is the process of sorting pixels into a finite number of
individual classes, categories of data based on their DN (Digital Number)
values”.
With advent
of modern high resolution era of satellite images, PIXEL based, Object based
and many other machine learning algorithms have been developed.
Currently
the prospects of a new classification concept, Object-Based Classification, are being investigated. Recent studies
have proven the accuracy of object-based classification over traditional
classifiers. The object-based classification approach relies on basic principle
to use other information such as shape, texture and 3D information from DEM
(Digital Elevation Model), and ancillary GIS data.
Change
detection is defined as detecting spatial and spectral change in an object over
a time span probably using temporal data sets. With advent of 21st
century and rapid urbanization, accurate and timely updated information
regarding LULC (land use land cover land cover) change and its spatial
variations is significant for urban planning and management.
Our research
domain for this project is based on Object-Based
Classification and post-classification
change detection technique. Data set
used for the study was multi-temporal high-spatial resolution imagery acquired
by IKONOS sensor. Area of Interest was Lafayette-west from 2005 to 2018. Object-Based
Classification techniques including, Multi-resolution segmentation was done on three
images, then an object-based fuzzy approach was applied to implement the land
cover classification separately for each of the three years i.e. 2005, 2013
& 2018. The object based and fuzzy approach was selected because it
provides accurate and better results for change detection by incorporating
spatial information and user defined expert knowledge. After rule set
definition buildings of AOI were extracted and refined for object based
post-classification comparison. Results were graphically and statistically
compared for year 2005, 2013, & 2018. E-cognition ArcMap by Esri, and Erdas
Imagine by Intergraph were used for our research project.
1.1 Objective
To make use of high
resolution remote sensing data by incorporating object-based fuzzy
classification and post-classification change detection to detect buildings of
Lafayette-west for year 2005, 2013 & 2018.
1.2 Study Area
Lafayette is
a city in and the parish seat of Lafayette Parish, Louisiana located along the
Vermilion River in the southwestern part of the state. The city of Lafayette is
the fourth-largest in the state, with a population of 127,657 according to 2015
U.S. Census estimates, It is the principal city of the Lafayette, Louisiana
Metropolitan Statistical Area, with a 2015 estimated population of 490,488. The
larger trade area or Combined Statistical Area of Lafayette-Opelousas-Morgan
City CSA was 627,146 in 2015. Its nickname is The Hub City.
Figure 1.2 Study Area Zone-1
1.3 Data set used
High
Resolution Imagery provided by
·
IKONOS imagery of
2013 and 2018
3D
Information extracted using
·
DEM and DSM of
study area 2005
Reference
Data
·
2005 building
footprints
Ancillary
Data
·
Address data
·
Zoning Data
·
Roads Data
1.4 Software used
·
Ecognition by Trimble
·
ArcGIS by ESRI
·
Erdas Imagine by Intergraph
·
MS Excel by Microsoft
|
Image Source: Intergraph |
METHODOLOGY
Data was acquired, based on data quality no digital image processing was
required. Image was further treated on ecognition software. Object based Classification
was done on 2013 and 2018 imagery. Use of DEM and DSM provided subjected
further ease in building detection.
Approach was made to
distinguish shadow and buildings using NIR band threshold, Water was classified
from shadow class by applying area threshold. Vegetation was classified by
applying NDVI threshold. Buildings were then classified on the basis of height
threshold and sub classified into child classes by applying area threshold as
we have different area ranges in building class. Building class was classified
by selecting samples and using nearest neighbor classifier. Most of the area at
first was classified into building. Roads were separated from the imagery and
building class by applying length threshold, vegetation using the same NDVI
approach and child classes of building class was classified from buildings by
applying area and length to width ration threshold.
Detailed step by step approach:
1. Open the ecognition software.
2. Click on “create new project”
option.
3. Import the “Study area image”
from the workspace.
4. Assign weights to NIR band
5. Click on the layers and rename
each layer. Layer 1 as blue, layer 2 as green, and 3rd as red and 4th NIR.
6. Go to “Process” option on the
top toolbar and open “ process tree” All the operations in ecognition are
executed through the “ process tree”
7. Right click in “process tree”
window and open the option “Append new”. Uncheck the “Automatic option” and
type the name “Segmentation” and click OK.
8. The parent class
“segmentation” has been added. Now click the ‘segmentation” option and select
the “Insert child” option to add sub classes.
9. Click the first segmentation
algorithm” Multi Resolution Segmentation”
and select the execute option.
10. Execute next “Multiresolution,
Spectral difference”
Note that Execute Multi
Resolution segmentation Scale 70 value -average size of objects Shape (0.4)
weight -Geometric form of the objects Compactness (0.6) Value- The higher the
value, the more compact image objects maybe.
11.
Make classes in class
hierarchy
12.
Create NDVI
13.
Apply threshold
14.
Define other rule set such as
NIR, DN value. Length/width ratio etc….
15.
Export Classes
16.
Data Cleansing in ArcMap
RESULTS
High
resolution imageries of 2013 and 2018 were classified by object based fuzzy
classification and with the aid of building footprint, address point and zoning
data and change detection and comparison was done. Results generated are
Buildings Count
|
|||
Entities
|
2005
|
2013
|
2018
|
Total Building
|
131
|
203
|
234
|
Medical-Related MR
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Planned Residential Development
|
107
|
180
|
212
|
Single Family Residential
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
Single_Two and Multi Family
Residential
|
16
|
16
|
16
|
Table 3.1 Statistics
of Building Detection
Change Detection Maps
Conclusion
Object based fuzzy approach proved to be an efficient accurate and time saving image classification approach. Due to Urbanization buildings are increasing with the passing years. Using fuzzy rules by giving appropriate thresholds the accuracy of the classification increases. Change detection analysis showed growth in planned residential development both in 2013 and 2018. Small growth was also observed in single and multifamily residential area. Availability of very high spatial and temporal resolution remote sensing data facilitates mapping highly complex and diverse urban environments. Project concluded that
· Incorporating high resolution aerial digital images and elevation data, and it’s processing using object-based image analysis through various rule set for mapping urban land covers and quantifying buildings is no doubt an efficient and accurate technique.
· The Project presents and demonstrates an approach for formulating an optimal land covers classification rule set over small representative training urban area image, and its subsequent transfer to the same, and different multi-sensor, multi-temporal images.
· There also was very rigorous selection of the object features for all of the land cover classes and iterative classification and rules updating
· Shadows missclassified as buildings are corrected with additional segmentation and using the shape and context features re-applied to the buildings class only
· This process picks up most of the shadow correctly, but if some shadow segments over the roofs still remain, the building can be split into parts
· Overall, the height information helped capture most of the buildings, which otherwise are very diverse in their spectral and shape characteristics
References
- K. Leukert, A. Darwish and W. Reinhardt, “Urban Land-cover Classification: An Object-based Perspective,” 2nd Joint Workshop on Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas, Berlin, May 2003.
- P. Mather, Computer processing of remotely-sensed images, Chichester: Wiley, 1999. [3] B. Jähne, Digitale Bildverarbeitung, Berlin: Springer, 1993.
- R. Haralick, L. Shapiro, Computer and robot vision, Vol. 1, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
- Definiens imaging, eCognition user guide [Online]. Available: http://www.definiens-imaging.com/documents/index.htm, April 2003.
- NIMA, Geospatial Standards and Specifications [Online]. Available: http://164.214.2.59/publications/specs/index.html, April 2003.
- Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R., “Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation”, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
- E. Mendoza, R. Dirzo Deforestation in Lacandonia (southeast Mexico): evidence for the declaration of the northernmost tropical hot-spot
- Biodiversity and Conservation, 8 (1999), pp. 1621-1641
Comments
Post a Comment